Expanding my Tech Business into Africa... The Early Days

In my last post, I wrote about the rise of AppsTech. A meteoric rise it was. With no funding, a young African woman had succeeded in building a global tech business.

We were profitable, had happy customers across the globe, and we had year-on-year growth of 200%. As we demonstrated innovation in the delivery of services, we also placed a great emphasis on innovation in products.

In 2001, AppsTech acquired a startup that had designed a mobile applications development platform. Their CEO was a Kunle M., a brilliant Nigerian entrepreneur who would become a key player at AppsTech. His startup became Mobile AppsTech. Kunle led the initiative and also joined our Executive Committee as Chief Strategy Officer. Mobile AppsTech won several awards, including from the State of Pennsylvania that gave us a spot in their incubator in Philadelphia. We wanted to scale this business fast as we were feeling pressure from giants like Oracle, who were starting to incorporate mobile development tools into their middleware.

As our CSO, Kunle was also working on AppsTech Africa, our vision to become the largest provider of enterprise software solutions on the African continent. We had sensed already in 2001 that Mobile and Africa were going to be big. We needed to figure out how to marry the two.

Kunle starts to court MTN, a South African telco that was expanding fast across the continent. They were our role model for expansion into Africa. More importantly, they had a mobile apps subsidiary that they wanted to get out of. We jumped at the opportunity.

The Thought Board in Kunle's Office

So while Kunle was busy negotiating with MTN, we were opening an office in my native Cameroon. Kunle thought it was a bad idea. Actually, he thought it was a horrible idea. For him, the country presented too many risks and not sufficient rewards. “The numbers don’t add up Rebecca.” Kunle agreed we should have a small office there but he didn’t think Cameroon should be the gateway into our expansion into Africa. But I was the group CEO and I won. I said this before but Kunle was smart. And I really should have listened to him. You’ll soon understand why.

We had already started subletting a small office in Cameroon to support our sales activity and had a staff of three. It made sense that Cameroon should be our regional hub. The country was bilingual French and English so it could support our expansion into both Anglophone and Francophone Africa. I also had strong ties there and I was sure that I could leverage my relationships with my childhood friends who were now decision makers as well as access my father’s extensive network.

Because of our “global from day one” vision, and because we wanted to scale geographically very fast, we had developed our own step-by step methodology for entering a new market. We had tested it in Canada, France and England and later in Ghana. So how hard could my own native country possibly be?

With the support of the rest of our executive team and a reluctant Kunle, I started to execute the plan. I registered the company, hired a country manager, rented office space and started the build-out. Some Columbia University MBA students followed me around for a few months, including to Cameroon and wrote their thesis on this experience which is available here. Pretty soon, we had pumped half a million dollars into this operation. Video of some of the construction is here

Fortunately, MTN’s local subsidiary in Cameroon launched an international RFP for an ERP system just a short time later. This was perfect. Most of our large customers worldwide were telcos. We were in the very first batch of Oracle certified e-Business Suite partners anywhere in the world and we had a local office in Cameroon. We were hugely qualified for the RFP. On the other side, MTN was the dream customer. They were growing fast on the continent, they were privately owned so we wouldn’t need to worry about corrupt government officials and we had already had an existing relationship with their parent company in South Africa. Even Kunle was excited.

What had propelled AppsTech to success was our unique delivery model. The project itself didn’t quite fit into this. One of our products was called FastApps for Oracle Financials which was a fixed price, fixed scope, fixed time turnkey solution. It worked for small business but MTN Cameroon was too large and too complex for this. So we ended up proposing a hybrid. A “FastApps” that was longer in time and more extensive in scope, but also had a fixed price with a formula on additional fees if the deadlines weren’t met.

We worked furiously on the proposal, responding to hundreds of technical questions and asking quite a few ourselves in order to better scope the project. We had huge competitors, all the big software companies had bid, including Oracle Africa itself. Our hard work paid off and we made it through to the next round (kicking Oracle’s a**).

Jean-Michel, our EVP for Tech Solutions and 6 other people including myself, flew to Cameroon to present the proposal and do a product demo. Internet was very unreliable so we had even traveled with our own server. Our offices were still under construction so we had set up in a suite in a local hotel and literally worked 24/7. Sleeping was not allowed.

The presentation went very well. We made it to the final round.

For the following two months, an MTN team embarked on a four country due diligence tour, flying to France, the US and Canada to meet with our staff, our customers and even our bankers.

This meant that each time, I, or another executive had to fly to meet them too. This proposal project was becoming a major distraction. In order to respond to the extensive technical questions, we had pulled several of our best resources to work full time on the proposal. We also had to build a prototype for the demo including a custom interface into a point-of-sale system called Lexys, the only online/offline French/English system we could find.

But the proposal project wasn’t just distracting my time, it had distracted my focus. Kunle started complaining but he wasn’t alone. The finance team started raising concerns about the cost of the proposal to our business, especially when added to the new Cameroon office and its construction budget overruns. Some of the non-Africans on the team started to question the whole Africa vision.

We had never had to devote so much time, so much effort, and so much money to any customer during the proposal process. I argued that this was a loss-leader, and if we won this project and succeeded in the delivery, MTN assured us that we would implement the solution in their other subsidiaries. This client was essential in our African growth strategy.

I wasn’t worried about executing the project. We mastered the technology. But what if we didn’t win? My real question should have been “What if we won?”

Next time, I will answer that.

Top in ICT in Sub-Saharan Africa -Mauritius, South Africa and ...The Gambia?

Sub-Saharan Africa did very poorly on the latest World Economic Forum’s Networked Readiness Index (NRI) with the majority of the region lagging in the bottom half of the 138 countries being ranked in the report. Exceptions were Mauritius (which ranks 47th) and South Africa (which ranks 61st).
Burundi (137th) and Chad (138th) were the worst ranked of all countries on the list.
Rwanda, which probably would have fared pretty well within Sub-Saharan Africa, was not ranked. This is rather strange since Rwanda’s ICT efforts are mentioned in the report. Moreover, Rwanda’s government has set the country on a fast-lane to technology growth.
The ranking holds some surprises. The Gambia and Senegal rank higher than Kenya even though Kenya did rise 9 places since the 2010 report. Hmmm. How much did The Gambian and Senegalese governments pay? :)
Here are the rankings of Sub-Saharan African countries

Country	Rank	Notable Improvement
Mauritius	47
South Africa	61
Gambia	76
Senegal	80
Kenya	81	up 9 spots since 2010
Namibia	82	up 7 spots since 2010
Cape Verde	84
Botswana	91
Ghana	99
Zambia	102
Nigeria	104
Malawi	105	up 14 since 2010
Mozambique	106	up 10 since 2010
Uganda	107	up 8 since 2010
Côte d’Ivoire	113
Benin	114
Tanzania	118
Mali	120
Lesotho	121
Burkina Faso	122
Ethiopia	123
Cameroon	125
Mauritania	130
Zimbabwe	132
Angola	133
Swaziland	134
Burundi	137
Chad	138

The full report is available of the World Economic Forum website for download (pdf)

Technorati Tags: Africa,Africatech,ICT,NRI,WEF,INSEAD,Sub-Saharan Africa,report

African Innovation Needs Real Venture Capital

I came across this Forbes article today by Mfonobong Nsehe in which he decries the absence of venture capitalists to support the technology innovators on the continent:

Africa has its own Mark Zuckerbergs, Andrew Masons, Mark Pincuses, Larry Pages and Sergey Brins. But it lacks its own Yuri Milners, John Doerrs, Vinod Khoslas and Y Combinators.

He adds:

Africans can create hugely successful tech products that will sweep the world off its feet. There are several entrepreneurs out there waiting to break through, but their ideas might never see the light of day because of a lack of seed finance. This is the reason Africa might never produce a Facebook, Groupon, Zynga or Google: There are no venture capital firms in Africa to fund these ventures.

Nsehe is right. When it comes to African technology, there is no, or little venture capital available to African entrepreneurs. The financing that is available generally comes from “social’ or ‘development’ type funders, not from venture capitalists wanting to get a huge return on investment. As a result, the funding comes in very small increments of $10,000 to $25,000. This is a lot of money in Africa but it cannot help African innovation compete at a worldwide scale.

Ushahidi is a perfect example of this. This revolutionary technology, whose founder is Kenyan woman entrepreneur Ory Okolloh (pictured). The technology has received worldwide acclaim and has been used around the world. But their funding mostly came from this social/development community. In fact, the funders listed on the Ushahidi web site almost all end in “Foundation.”

Sure, you could argue that Ushahidi has a “social benefit” aspect to it and therefore, it is normal that the funding would come primarily from the development or social funding community. But I wonder if the funders’ list had been different, if the technology could not have evolved into a profitable business venture as well.

A few years ago, I ran into a VC firm that had raised money from Vivendi and other big players. Their sole objective was to fund African technology. This was exciting. However, they were only interested in these mom and pop tech firms that had a ‘social’ benefit. The VC firm soon disappeared.

As an African woman, it is worse. You say funding, and the automatic reaction is “Micro-Finance,” a real pet peeve for me. As if African women entrepreneurs were incapable of managing anything more than a $50 loan. (Don’t let me get going on the women and finance thing here…). Development, social and micro-finance are not evil. They have their role and do help keep millions out of poverty. But Africa cannot develop by simply trying to not be poor. We need real multi-million dollar financing for African innovation. Is there risk? Of course there is, but no more than funding an online pet shopping site in Silicon Valley.

Technorati Tags: African technology,venture capital,africa entrepreneur,Forbes,Ushahidi

, Mfonobong Nsehe

Doing Business in Africa: Who is the Mad Man – or Woman?

We have a common saying in this country: “if you are swimming in the river, a mad man comes and steals your clothes and you leave the river naked to run after the mad man, who is really the mad man?

I am feeling a lot like the man (in this case woman) running naked after a mad man to get my clothes back. That is what it feels like to try to do business ethically in this country.

When crooked competitors win contract after contract while you struggle do make ends meet, who is the mad man?

When a customer tears up a payment because you refuse to bribe the accountant and says “see how you will get paid now,” who is the mad man?

When thugs working for an “enemy” are allowed to break down your door and assault you, the police comes and tells them “go home” without any punishment because you don’t bribe them, who is the mad man?

Perhaps what makes me even more the “mad woman” is that I still think something is wrong with the way the system works but I still persist in going against it.

I run after the mad man when I speak out about the lost contract, raising examples of unethical behavior – when the decision makers were certainly in on the deal.

I run after the mad man when I sue the customer to get my payment – in a corrupt judicial system that will drag the case on for years before eventually awarding me a judgment I can’t execute.

I run after the mad man when I protest to high level police officials – who tell me to go get my own thugs.

The examples are many. The point I am trying to make is that running counter-culture means running after the mad man. In the end, you are the one that looks stupid, the one that doesn’t get paid, the one that doesn’t get the contract, and the one that can’t get help from the police. I have frequently gotten laughed at to my face for refusing to bribe. And honestly, I begin to wonder if I am not the crazy one.

Fight for your Principles, Fight a System

I have learned that the more I am able to get around corruption, the more I am able to overcome systematic hurdles, the more attacks I should expect. At first, I anticipated that my adversaries would be the ones to launch these assaults, and they have. I remember in one legal dispute, my opponents took out full page ads in all the country’s newspapers and ran them an entire week, attacking my company’s integrity. Those types of attacks are normal and expected.

What I did not imagine is that people outside of the dispute would also join in, in a kind of a multiplier effect. You are not battling against an entity or a person but battling against a system. And those who rely on that system will fight you not because they have a particular problem with you but because the outcome of your dispute might shatter their whole structure. If one individual can actually win court cases, win contracts and do business without corruption, this could encourage others to do the same and jeopardize an entire system.

I try to do what is right under my circumstances. And while I do hope that the decisions that I make will have a positive impact beyond my personal situation, I don’t have the ambition to change the whole environment. Yet, the mere sense that someone – anyone – could get around their system causes collective panic and leads to numerous forces working to protect this order of things.

As a result, just staying in a corner, trying to survive while maintaining one’s ethics and principles can be an invitation to what I call “invisible forces.” Doing the right thing is so costly, so exhausting that it becomes a luxury. Not many can withstand the barrage of assaults that result from trying to operate outside of the system, and many don’t. It is just so much easier to just go along with the flow lest one become the target for destruction.

Even though I don’t promote this openly, it is pretty well known that I don’t engage in corrupt practices. But the environment survives and thrives on corruption. As a result, I am an enemy before I even decide to enter the ring.

As I mentioned in earlier posts, my father died a couple years ago and there has been a real battle surrounding his estate. My legal status happens to make me his primary heir even though he had lots of children. To avoid any battle, I thought that it would be best to simply share equally with everyone and stay out of the courts. As rational as this might seem, it was a huge mistake.

In fact, when there the potential for a dispute, especially when it involves significant amounts of money, the system needs a battle; lawyers need to get their fees; judges need their bribes; law enforcement authorities too. Therefore, the more fights they can create and the longer they can keep them going, the more they benefit. So the various forces will actually fuel the fight – this until there is nothing left to fight over, and then they move to another case. While I have understood this, many of my siblings have not and they have fallen hook line and sinker into the system’s trap.

More importantly, the “forces” know full well that they will not benefit from me and that if I have my way, the disputes will end. So I unwittingly become the target for their attacks with my siblings used as mere instruments. Unwittingly because I chose not to engage in the battle so they brought the battle to me. My offices have been physically attacked by dozens of thugs with the police, when called, just watching as our doors were broken down and locks changed; innumerable criminal complaints have been brought against me, simply because I chose to stand up for the truth; I am on trial for purportedly being a CIA agent and there are two eviction proceedings against my company because we are “a cover for the CIA.” A local police station even issued a warrant for my arrest for “espionage,” amongst other ridiculous accusations.

Of course, these are all ludicrous and unfounded attacks and those who brought the complaints know that there is no basis for them. But because I am brought into the ring, I have to defend myself, and therefore, I have to surrender to their system.

One of the many times I had to respond to law enforcement, they straight out told me that they knew that I was really the main heir but that my half-brother had shown them money and that I should show that I have more. I walked out, suggesting that if they had anything on me, they should simply arrest me.

Last week, I received a call from a friend of a magistrate that has one of the cases; again, he stated that others had made “offers” and that he wanted to give me the opportunity to make an offer of my own, suggesting that the decision would favor the highest bidder. Again, my response was simply that the judge simply do what he thought was right; I would not be “bidding.”

Because of the legal circumstances, it is very difficult for judges to outright decide against me, or for law enforcement to charge me with a crime. However, they drag the cases or investigations for as long as possible, hoping that the pressure and the financial cost of multiple lawsuits, complaints and disruption to my business will cause me to relent.

If I have been able to withstand the attacks so far, it is only through God’s grace. This does not mean it has been easy. It has taken a toll both on my personal and on my professional life. It has also caused me to put on hold many of my projects and other more constructive endeavors. So in that respect at least, the system has been victorious. Although it has not yet destroyed me, it has limited my ability to function normally – meaning against the system's interests.

I am an optimist and believe that good overcomes evil. I cannot allow the system to change what I believe in or to dilute my principles. I might lose a lot in a material sense but at least, I will maintain the very essence of who I am. This doesn’t sound very pragmatic but as some say, “pragmatism is the enemy of principle.”

Overcoming Corruption, Just this once... Maybe. Just Maybe.

A few years ago, our company was ordered to pay the current equivalent of $350,000 in an employment lawsuit. I blogged about it at the time. “Do me A Favor, Don’t do me any Favors.”


The case reeked with corruption from day one. The judge in the original case even mentioned to us that “If I were a judge in a bigger city, you would need to pay $10,000 (equivalent) just to talk to me.” He added that if we heard that he had met privately with our opponents that we should know that he is open to meet with everyone (for those not used to corruption lingo that means “I am open to an offer from you if it is better than theirs.”) We were naïve and had not understood the message. In any case, he rendered judgment against us without any basis in law or fact. After the judgment, he suggested that we should find a suitable settlement amount. We chose to appeal.

To handle the appeal, we so distrusted the lawyers in that area of the country that we decided to retain a lawyer in Europe who was also a member of the local Bar Association. We were right to do so. While preparing the appeal, our lawyer discovered that our counsel in the lower court case had actually been the lawyer for the opposing side during the period the case had been hidden from us! This had never been disclosed by either the lawyer or the judge.

During the appeal, our European based lawyer just could not understand how the judge had rendered such an obviously incorrect judgment. To assist him, he had a local partner. But he did not have full confidence in his own partner. So at each hearing, he sent us the submissions and asked us to send a representative to the court…. Just in case.

For the final arguments, our European based lawyer flew in and very eloquently pleaded our case for over an hour. The opposing counsel never said a word. Strange. The case was sent for deliberation by the panel of three judges.

Then month after month, the decision was postponed. No reason, just postponed. This went on for 8 long months. We know that long delays in rendering decisions are usually a call for the highest bidder. We also know that our opponents were willing to be very generous with judges and were not overly bothered with pleading their case or submitting evidence. Our lawyer's intense pleadings had seemed quite out of place in en environment where law and facts are not usually part of the equation.

After some time, we stopped sending our own representative to the Court because it was a waste of time and travel expenses so we relied on our European counsel’s local partner. So when a hearing was scheduled yesterday to announce the decision, we did not send anyone.


For a reason that we will better understand one day, our European counsel’s local partner decided not to show up. We had no idea therefore, if a decision had been rendered, and if so, what it was. Worse, the local partner stated that he would be unavailable to check on the decision until next week. It is important to note that the local partner is based in the area where the court is located and he could have easily sent someone or called the court to get the information .Our European based lawyer also got worried. We were afraid that judgment had been rendered against us and that the local partner was colluding with the opposing side to give them time to execute the judgment. Paranoia.

So we decided to send someone to the court today. Unbelievably, the court clerk had decided not to come to work and our file was locked in her office. Reached by telephone, she said she was “tired.” Yes, judgment had been rendered yesterday, but she could not remember what it was (our case was the most important employment case in several years..but she did not pay attention as she was writing out the decision). She asked that we return on Monday.

In a normal environment, one would just go away and come back but it our own legal system, court clerks never miss work unless they are paid to do so by a party in court’ Usually, to allow them to either execute the judgment or to allow an application for a stay of execution. (I have learned a lot since 2006).

Thinking quickly on his feet, the person we sent to the Court explained to her colleagues that he would need to send for a bailiff to record that on a business day, he was unable to obtain information on a judgment from the Court of Appeals. He said that since he had been paid travel expenses, his bosses would never believe that no one could give him the information. Within 5 minutes, the Chief Registrar called the Court clerk and she showed up 30 minutes later.

Strangely (and happily of course), the judgment was in our favor. The judgment from the lower court was set aside. We don’t know what the games were about but we will surely discover eventually. One can become so paranoid that it really could be that the local lawyer was unavailable and the court clerk was too tired to come to work. I would like to say that our mind has become so twisted that we think everyone is corrupt and the whole legal system is set against us but somehow, something still seems fishy. Update coming…

Bidding for World Bank Financed Project: An Exercise in Futility

Any company or organization that has submitted a bid for to a large organization, especially when the funding comes from international sources, is aware that the results are often decided before the RFP is even drafted. The Request for Proposal (RFP) is generally designed so that only a pre-determined bidder can meet the requirements. This does not only happen in Africa. We have seen this occur even in the US and Europe. I remember a seminar for Federal government contractors in the US during which the main speaker said that “if you’re not 70% sure that you will win, don’t bother to bid.”


Usually though, there is some pretense that this is a real RFP and that all bidders have a chance. This way, they can justify awarding it to the “pre-selected” company by showing that X number of companies responded but none met the technical requirements.

I remember finding this out the hard way, working round the clock for weeks to finish a proposal on time, getting the bank guarantees, audited financial statements to respond to a very complex proposal. When it became clear that from a technical and financial standpoint our proposal was the best, they simply cancelled the process. When the new RFP came out, we did not meet the administrative requirements. :)

Still, even when we know we have little or no chance, we sometimes respond anyway. The process is important for our team to go through for practice and from a marketing standpoint, our company name should come out from time to time. So, when we recently saw a notice in the official newspaper for an RFP from a government owned agency for a system we have lots of experience with, we decided we would bid.

This decision was not one that the agency was very pleased with. According to the notice in the newspaper, anyone could consult the bidding document between certain hours. However, when we tried, during those very times, we were never able to see the document. The person who had the document seemed to always be gone as soon as we showed up.

Not to be discouraged we decided to blindly purchase the bidding document. The newspaper indicated a bank and account number to deposit the equivalent of roughly $50 to buy the document. So we went to the bank to make the deposit. Account number invalid. Indeed, the newspaper showed an account number with just 6 digits when all account numbers here have 13.

Then we tried to get information by attending a meeting announced in the newspaper notice for which there is a date, but no time. We sent someone who spent all day. The meeting was never held.

Finally yesterday, we were able to get the right bank account number. We deposited the funds and took the receipt to the agency to get the RFP. They are unable to give it to us because their copy machine is out of paper! I am not making this up.

We have lost already three precious weeks while the agency continues to play games with us. We are only more determined than ever to respond. Since this is a World Bank financed project, we will certainly get the RFP (which we paid for) just in time for our name to be added to the list of expected bidders but too late to obtain the required bank guarantee and to meet the other administrative conditions listed in the document.

The World Bank is meant to be a development organization but most of their funded projects are awarded through a process that is often less than equitable and is sometimes the result of blatant corruption. The World Bank seems to be aware of this. They have an elaborate system of reporting on the procurement process: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/PROCUREMENT/0,,contentMDK:20251613~pagePK:84269~piPK:84286~theSitePK:84266,00.html. But under what category would you put Copy machine out of paper?

Being Blackmailed into Tax Fraud

In this African country I am in, tax officials do everything within their power to push honest taxpayers into fraud. They do this so that the taxpayer becomes out of compliance and can then be blackmailed into bribes.

A couple weeks ago, our company signed a new corporate lease for the building we are in. We extended the lease term to 10 years and we expanded the amount of space we were in. Our contract calls for our rent to be paid monthly in advance.

The law requires that all contracts be registered with tax officials within a 30 day period from signature. The registration fee is equal to 5% of the yearly lease amount and it must be paid every year and in advance.

So when we went to the tax office to register our new lease yesterday, we went prepared to pay the 5% of the yearly lease amount. Let’s say our rent is $1,000 per month, which comes to $12,000 per year. That would be a $600 registration fee.

After looking at the content of the lease, the tax officials told us that since it was a commercial lease, the tax is 10% annually and not 5%. So this morning, we returned to the tax office with the 10% fee which, based on our example, is $1,200.

Well, as if that is not enough of a hindrance for taxpayers, the tax officials informed us today that since the lease is for 10 years, we must pay in advance, the tax for the 10 years. In our same example, this would mean $12,000 in taxes to comply to register a lease for which monthly rent is $1,000!

We don’t think this is true. But the tax officials are refusing to register the lease. They will probably continue to refuse until the 30 day period is passed. After the 30 days, there is a 100% penalty. This means that whether we have to pay the registration tax for 1 year or 10 years, the fee will be doubled. So we will have to pay, under the example, $2,400 or $24,000 to make legal a lease for which rent is $1,000 a month.

Of course, the tax officials will then propose an easier, less expensive way, through bribery. We have decided not to give in to the blackmail. We will pay an amount equivalent to 10% in tax and get our receipt, even if they don’t register the lease itself.

It is exhausting to try to fight corruption day in and day out. It would be so much easier to go with the flow. We are continuously “punished” for trying to do the right thing. I wonder how much longer we will be able to resist…

Judicial Corruption and What Can be Done About It

The judicial system in this country is one of the most corrupt segments of society. Yet, I have never heard of a judge being arrested or charged with corruption.

This is even when it is abundantly clear that the judge was influenced in rendering a decision. If these magistrates were “massaging” the law in an effort to be fairer than the law is, this would be legislating from the bench which is still wrong but certainly more tolerable. But fairness has nothing to do with it.

Technically, judges are independent from the government and judges seem to take this independence quite literally. They are also independent from the law; independent from the facts; and independent from any semblance of ethics or propriety.

I asked an official in the ministry of justice why it was that despite the recent anti-corruption drive in the country, no judge had ever been charged with corruption. He explained that corruption was very difficult to prove since the judge could always justify his decision by stating is was judicial error. The most the government can do is to transfer them to a less desirable court or, in very rare cases, revoke them. Basically, incompetence is a judge’s best defense.

Because there is no fear of real sanctions, most judges are not afraid to render blatantly wrong decisions. The attraction of the bribe, which amounts in many cases to more than the judge can earn in an entire career, is much more potent than the fear of being transferred to some remote town where they will be handling disputes over goats.

In fact, the amount a judge was bribed in a case is often an open secret. My father died about a year and a half ago and as in most inheritance situations, siblings have been battling each other in court. One of them convinced a judge to order a marriage certificate to be drawn up for his mother, after getting the judge to order a birth certificate be issued to him. So after my Dad died, he mysteriously reemerged to have a 50 year old son and to get married. The marriage certificate clearly states:

On this day ….[3 months after my Dad died] Before us, appeared publicly….

The judge signed and certified the birth and marriage certificates. Some of my siblings who heard about this immediately petitioned the court to have the order nullified. Unfortunately for them, they ended up before the same judge who of course, stuck to his guns. This case created enough scandal that the judge was sanctioned pretty quickly. Although he was not transferred, he was sent cases of no significance. This meant that his bribe income dropped significantly. He complained to whoever would listen that he had jeopardized his career and had only received less than $3,000 for that court order and now realized it was not worth it.

In another case, a different sibling was able to get access to a bank account that held more than $2 million in it. In this case, he went judge shopping which is always a risk because the judge that doesn’t get the deal will spread the word. He first went to the only judge that had territorial jurisdiction over the matter. We don’t know all the details but the arrangement broke down and the sibling moved to another judge in another court. This judge, who was outside of the proper jurisdiction, requested about $20,000 to sign the court order. My sibling borrowed funds and came up with a $4,000 deposit, promising the rest when the order was signed. Days turned to weeks, and the order was still not signed. Eventually, the sibling realized that the judge had no intention of ever signing. He couldn’t very well ask for a refund.

He then found a judge, again who was completely outside the jurisdiction. Imagine a New York court having jurisdiction but you manage to get a Washington, DC judge to sign your order. This judge unfortunately was much more expensive but he came with a guarantee. He would get the President of the Court of Appeals of his jurisdiction in on the deal which would ensure that the decision would not be overturned. For that, he would require $80,000. After much negotiation, they agreed the judge would be paid when the funds were released from the bank. $80,000 to get $2 million seems like quite a deal.

Another sibling (the one with the birth and marriage certificate) filed criminal charges and tried to get his brother arrested. He paid about $16,000 for that arrest. The sibling who was arrested was later released pending the rest of the investigation. Since he had not been able to spend all of the $2 million before getting caught, there is still over $1 million blocked. Recently, he received a call from a government official offering to have the funds released and his case closed for a mere $40,000.

What I find truly remarkable is that I don’t see or speak to either of these siblings and received none of this information from them. I only know the details because they are just not a secret. These details are out in the public domain. I could go tell officials in the ministry of justice but I might just end up with the one who offered to fix everything for $40,000.

Besides, I will get the same response. Even though they know that corruption was involved, this is impossible to prove. Unlike in the US or Europe were you could talk about wire fraud and follow the money trail through various front companies and financial institutions, we live in a cash society. Unless any of them got a receipt for the money they gave these judges, the cash will be difficult to trace.

Not all judges are corrupt but the honest ones are becoming more and more frustrated. I have a friend who is a judge. He has never been involved in any of my cases but I often go talk to him because he always has good advice. I remember the first time I went to see him I was in tears because my case had been dragging on for so long it was going to bankrupt my company. His advice was to try to find a way to take the case outside of the country! Usually though, he is quite supportive and encourages me to persevere.

This last time, I spent two hours in his office trying to console him. He was discouraged, disgusted and even despondent over the state of the judiciary in the country. Judges he had always respected and admired were now involved in some of the most corrupt cases in the country. There was no incentive to be honest. No incentive to apply the law. In fact, judges who try to remain ethical are more and more ostracized by their colleagues.

This society is broken to its core. The lack of a fair judiciary impacts all segments of society. How do you enforce a patent for innovative technology you have developed? How do you enforce a contract? How do you obtain justice when victim of a physical crime?

For the last few years, I have been mulling about developing a software application for the judiciary. I know they won’t buy it but if I can build it and donate it, they won’t be able to refuse. This won’t stop corruption but it might help to bring more transparency to the system. For example, there would be systematic checks and balances in the system. Gone would be the judgments which are registered and executed before they are rendered (that has happened to me twice!). We could build a system that would be accessible to judicial authorities so that they could monitor cases from their desks instead of waiting for reports that might come too late. We could build in business intelligence that displays in charts and graphs how long cases are taking from beginning to end. The reporting could be by judge, by type of case, by jurisdiction, by lawyer, by party. This will not stop particular lawyers from always going to particular judges but at least this would more obvious.

Perhaps if God led a technology entrepreneur into the jowls of judicial corruption, He intended for me to do something about it. Perhaps God has nothing to do with it and I am still living in denial, hoping that the system can change, despite the evidence that it doesn’t want to. That’s the problem with entrepreneurs. Passion often overrides logic and leads to all sorts of justification for charging forward, blind to the reality around them. That is our greatest fault but it is also our greatest asset.

So I better start forging ahead with my judicial application…

Finally! A Change in the Tax Law That Makes Sense

One of the things that has most frustrated me about this country over the years is that a company cannot file its yearly tax return itself. To submit your tax return to the tax authorities, it must be certified by an approved chartered accountant.

We generally don't have many transactions over a period of a year even if the amounts of each transaction can be substantial for the country. Our tax returns are therefore pretty straight forward. We employ chartered accountants who could very well have prepared our returns but the law did not allow this.

As a result, we have always had to use an outside accounting firm. This can become very expensive. They charge you one amount to prepare the return and another to certify it. On an average, we end up with a bill of between $6,000 and $10,000 for a very straight forward return.

Last year, we thought we would be smart and have an accountant prepare the return and then just get the certification from the accounting firm. The accountant works with a network of accounting firms and she gave us a quote of roughly $600 for the certification. We already found that amount excessive but this would be cheaper than having the accounting firm do both.

When the accountant completed the return, she took it to the accounting firm for certification. They wanted $3,000. Why? Because the accountant had underestimated our income when she quoted the $600 and these accounting firms base their fee on the client's tax revenues and not on how much work is involved. We tried other firms but they were all in the same range or even higher.

I just noticed in the new 2010 tax laws that this certification is no longer required. This is really excellent news. There are many small business who simply can't afford to submit a tax return even if they owe little or nothing simply because they cannot afford to get the return prepared by an accounting firm or get it certified.

Some people (the accounting firms) point out that this will result in increased fraud. I disagree with this entirely. First of all, the accounting firms just sign and stamp. They don't really look at the document. These are not audited by the accounting firms, just certified. Moreover, more companies will now be able to afford to file their taxes which reduces, not increases fraud.

I also think that the accounting firms will have to provide added value (like tax advice or revising the tax return) rather than simply certifying it for a fee.

I have not looked at all the provisions in the new tax laws and I am sure to find some that I will cry over. But at least this one is really quite positive.

Paying for Air or a New Utilities Billing Concept

Our office here just received its monthly water bill a few days ago. About $30. This is a lot for an office and it is twice what we were paying about a year ago. Worse, the water service is so infrequent that we often go several days with no running water. I asked our accounting manager why the sudden jump in the cost when we were using less water.

The accountant explained that we were paying for air. Yes. Really. After noticing that our bills were unusually high given the usage, the accountant and a plumber did a test. They checked the water meter when there was no service and noticed that the meter was running. After some tests, they realized that whenever we opened any water faucet or tried to flush the toilet, the meter would count that as water used! I thought this was impossible.

A couple days ago, I ran into the water meter reader. He seemed friendly and I asked him about this strange billing. He actually admitted that this was indeed the case and that many people were complaining about it but that there was nothing he could do.

The water utility was privatized a couple years ago as one of these World Bank / IMF imperatives. The quality of the water has not improved; the service has gotten worse and the prices have increased. I was in the office of the CEO of the water utility once and I thought it was very telling that he had bottled water on his desk!

I have not seen the new financial results for the water utility. I would not be surprised to see that their profitability increased substantially. After all, they are the exclusive distributor of paid air in the country.

Business Insider Article on Corruption in Africa

http://www.businessinsider.com/ recently published an article on corruption in Africa.



I don't have the other side of the story but this is a very common tale which is certainly not unique to Senegal. Few, if any, of these large licenses or concessions occur without corruption. I am not saying this happened in Millicom's case and I certainly have no inside information but a lot of times these stories become a scandal only when "corruptor" and "corrupted" stop seeing eye to eye.

I read comments that Millicom's license had been revoked for number of years ago but they were still able to do business. Under what agreement? Why didn't Millicom protest then? I am not in any way defending the government of Senegal but in the game of corruption, it takes two to play....

This should serve as an example to other companies who tend to close their eyes when they first want to get in and then are surprised when their former partners come begging for more. I remember meeting a delegation of one of the largest US telecom companies coming to the country I am in. They were really interested in the market. They eventually decided that the risk was not worth it. As they explained to me in private, they were not "experienced" enough with the business environment.

African nations should understand that by requiring foreign investors to bribe officials to get these licenses and concessions, they will get a type of investor that is not necessarily a good corporate citizen. Real investors shy away and sharks come in to do business.

Electric Hell

Not a day goes by when we don’t have to deal with issues that are just not issues in the US. Between the tax guys, the water guys, the Internet guys, and the electric guys, you need a whole team of administrative folks just to spend time dealing with them.

Electricity is very erratic; blackouts and brownouts are common. We estimate our direct losses due to power surges at over $30,000. This is mostly computer equipment but also air conditioners that were damaged or destroyed after frequent power surges

In any case, it is not bad enough that we lose money to their power surges or from days of going without power or the cost of buying and maintaining a generator, the day-to-day service is even worse and the cost is excessive, not to say abusive.

Our average electric bill is roughly $1,200 a month. This is for about 4,000 kwh. Of that, about $245 is fixed. This means that if we use absolutely no power, we still have to pay for the meter rental (about $5 a month) and a “fixed premium” ($240 a month) which no one will explain to us. The bills are payable within 10 days. Cash or certified check. There is no late notice. They just disconnect your service. The problem is that the date on the bill is usually a week or more before you actually get the bill (they are hand delivered and not mailed) so in fact, you have a day or 2 to pay your bill before facing disconnection. And despite their inefficiencies in providing poor service all around, they are extremely effective is sending out teams of disconnection agents who go as far as removing the meter.

In March, we received a bill that was much higher than average. It was about $1700. It was dated on the 2nd but we received it on the 10th. On the 12th, we wrote to the electric company asking for an explanation for the excessive bill, an explanation for the so-called “fixed premium” and for additional time to pay. They refused to take the letter. Simply refused. After spending hour after hour, day after day at the neighborhood branch trying to meet with the branch manager or getting a letter delivered, we finally gave up and tried to pay the bill. We couldn’t. Our account had been cancelled. No reason. No explanation. A couple days later, technicians from the electric company came with a note from the branch manager requiring we prove that we had a legal connection. They wanted to remove the meter since we had “no account”. We gave them all the required documents and they eventually left.

Still unable to meet with the branch manager and unable to have any letter accepted by the receptionist, we took a bailiff with us to the branch. We were allowed in and were able to meet with the branch manager. After a long discussion that was going nowhere, we still did not know why or when they cancelled the account. The branch manager asked us to fill out an application for a new account and pay the required fee, almost $900 to get the same subscription load we have now.

So let me get this straight. You cancel my account for absolutely no reason and for me to get another account I have to REAPPLY and PAY AGAIN!!!! I was trying my best not to reach over his desk and slam his face into his PC. The colleague I was with stayed calm and the bailiff was just shaking his head in disbelief. Seeing our “reluctance” the branch manager went so far as to suggest we could hand write the application not to waste any time.

We asked that they give us a written explanation for the cancellation of our account as well as putting in writing that we needed to sign up for and pay for a new account.. We told them that we would have to justify to our “management” why we needed a new subscription when we had already paid for one in the past. He refused saying the receipt for the new connection fee would be the only thing we would have and that we could send that receipt to our management if they wanted. In the meantime, his agents were coming around to our office to remove our meter since we are using it illegally. Fortunately, we locked the main access to the building and have refused to let them in. They can disconnect us from the pole but it is more complicated and it will take them a few days.

After leaving the branch yesterday, we wrote a letter to the branch manager and had it delivered by our bailiff this morning. Our bailiff spent over and hour and a half listening to the branch manager’s explanations. He came back saying that the branch manager told him that he had received instructions from his head office to cancel our service and that since it was cancelled, the only solution was to reapply and pay again. He “generously” offered to give us some time to pay for the connection fee as long as we reapplied now. Of course, this was unacceptable to us. We managed to get the branch manager on the phone and we asked him for the contact at his head office we could get the explanation from. He completely changed his story and now claimed that the head office had nothing to do with it.

Since our last letter was delivered by bailiff, they will have to answer. In the meantime, we are illegally using electric power which we paid over $2,400 at the time to get installed and we could lose power at any moment.

This place is truly hell.

Fiscal Tyranny (Part 1)

Yesterday, our tax adviser stopped by for a meeting to discuss our monthly filings. A meeting that was intended to raise her concerns about hotel bills turned into a philosophical discussion about taxes in this country.

Our tax advisor’s specific concern was that we had paid hotel bills for some people but that our records did not reflect a contract for those people or any consulting payment to them. Our explanation to her was that these people were company staff in the US and Europe who had travelled to our country to provide sales and technical assistance just made it worse. That meant that we needed to pay a technical assistance tax of 15% for those individuals. We explained that they were employed by our US and European entities and therefore there was no fee to be paid by our local entity and 15% of 0 was 0.

She explained that this would never fly with the tax authorities. We needed to draft a technical assistance contract for their work with an estimation of the value of their services even though the services would not be paid for. She also warned that without those contracts, we would likely have to pay for payroll related taxes for those individuals even though they are not on our payroll. Of course, once a contract is established, it needs to be “registered” with the tax authorities and the “fee” is 2% of the value of the contract. If the contract was registered late, then there is a 100% penalty for the fee. There are also taxes on the fees which are about 50%. So really you are paying 3% or 6% if you register more than 30 days after the work is performed. If the amount is under the $US of $10,000 then the registration “fee” is actually 5% plus the taxes, all doubled if you are 30 days late.

So because we wanted to reinforce our local activities with resources who came in from overseas we now had to pay thousands of dollars in taxes for services which we never had to pay for out of our local coffers.

This was insane but very logical to this poor tax advisor who was just doing her job. She was so enmeshed in the tax code and the way of doing business in this country that she was oblivious to the madness of the tax code and surprised that we objected to it. She really believes that this is the way business is done all over the world and she said that we were the first to complain not just about the process (will blog about that another time) but about the tax structure itself.

And that is the real problem. It is impossible to make real progress when most stakeholders do not understand that business as usual in this country is detrimental to our development. Everyone focuses on enforcing the current system and or complaining about the heaving handed collection process. But what is needed is a complete change in mentality. Taxes, fees, duties are not elements of progress for business but elements of repression. This by itself is not unique to this country. Business people all over the world complain about taxation and regulation. The state of Maryland, where our business was started, has just instituted a sales tax on computer services amidst an uproar from the tech community. Where this becomes insidious in a developing country like the one I am in is that the complexity and multiple layers of taxation are taken as an opportunity for tax officials to personally enrich themselves. The more complicated the tax structure is, the more repressive it is, the more taxpayers will look for ways to cheat and tax officials are all too happy to assist them in that manner… for a personal fee.

OLPC's Fatal Flaw

I have a lot of admiration for Nicholas Negroponte and the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) team. By in large, they got the technology right. They brought the right partners together and created an unbelievable product. The technological advances that are found in the $100 (OK, $300) laptop will certainly impact the way computers are built tomorrow.

OLPC has not had the expected success. There is nothing technically wrong with it. The pricing is reasonable. So why hasn't the laptop caught on in the developing world it was designed for?

The name says it all: ONE laptop PER child. The idea might be appealing to the western world but it is not a cultural fit for the developing world, or at least Africa where I am blogging from. Africans are very communal in nature. Outside of the wealthy elite that is not the target of the OLPC anyway, Africans don't individually own things, especially not children. Whoever has a radio or a television shares it with not just the immediate family, but the entire community. One never watches TV alone and one does not sit in a corner and read alone or get on a computer alone. People still do things together. Not because they are forced to but because that is the way they prefer it.

How do you reconcile this communal culture with the OLPC technology? Probably through a new approach. As well intended as the project sponsors are, I simply cannot imagine any African politician buying into the idea in any meaningful way. It is one of those things that are difficult to explain. Kind of like explaining to a white person what is it like to be black. You can't really put it into words.

Maybe they could rename it "laptops for all" and set them up for multiple users. Maybe they could change the target from children to families. It might not sound very politically correct but a business owner could leverage the technology a lot more and turn the laptop into increased revenue. By keeping track of inventory, accounting, communicating with customers and vendors electronically, the businessperson would use it in the day and his/her kids could use it in the evening. You could then have the government partially subsidize the computer and set up a loan through credit union or other micro-credit institution to finance the rest. Then you would have "One Laptop per Family" which is more in tune with our culture.... and, because it is contributing to economic growth, would be more sustaining long term.

Africans Don't Trust Africans with Technology

One would logically think that the most likely consumers of African technology would be Africans. Not so. Africans do not trust each other to provide quality technology.

Last year, we heard that a large company that is almost across the street from us wanted to implement a CRM (Customer Relationship Management) system. Since we are one of the few companies with experience in that area and given that we worked with several of this company's sister companies in various countries, including the US, we thought we had a good shot at getting the project. We approached them and offered to make a presentation. They explained to us that we were way too small for them and that they were going through an invitation only bidding process. Only European companies would be invited. Because there are few CRM implementations in this country, we thought that we would offer to assist them, at no cost, so that there would be a reference for a CRM project in the country. They refused. They were hiring consultants from Europe to provide project support. OK. Even free, our services are not worth it. Jeez.

A few months later, we received a call from a European company that was bidding on a CRM project in Africa. They did not have any experience and did not have any resources and they wanted to know if we would partner with them. You guessed it. Same client. Same project. We agreed.

We had to prepare the entire proposal and provide OUR references. Our partner company prettied up the proposal with their logo and made no reference to us. They redid the resumes so that our name would not appear anywhere. The proposal was shortlisted and the client requested a presentation. Oops. Our partner's sales folks flew in but, unable to answer any technical questions, had to include us. So we accompany them across the street for the presentation. Client did not hide their surprise. Our proposal turned out to be the best one. We (our partners) won. So here it was. We were not allowed to interact directly with the client so our partner sent a "project manager" to this country. Over a period of six months, we actually saw 4 different ones.

So here we were in this ridiculous process of having to send the project manager emails that he then copied and pasted into his emails to the client. The client would answer and he would forward the emails to us. Then, in the fine European tradition, our partner's project manager had to go on vacation so the project was at a standstill while he went on holiday. Then they sent someone new (after all, this is an African country, you send the people none of your European clients would accept). We lost 4 months on a project that should have lasted 3 as a result of the project management problems.

We would get sign off, send it to Europe, send them our bill. They would send their bill (our bill multiplied by 3) to the client. Client would wire the money to Europe and then, eventually (sometimes months later), partner wired money back to us. We eventually finished the project and the client was very pleased. Of course, our partner gets the reference and they profiled their success on their web site. As logical as it might seem for the client to contact us directly next time, they probably won't. They are too ashamed.

This was not the first time we faced the distrust of an African client. Before this subsidiary opened, we were contacted in the US by a large American software company for training on their technology in an African country. They knew that we had resources that could train in French (language of the client) and asked for some resumes. We sent the resume of our most qualified instructor. I got a phone call from the software company's African training manager. She asked if there was another resume I could send because our instructor's name sounded African. She said the African client complained that for the daily rate we were charging they "expected a White person." We did not do the training.

We do expect some push back from American and European clients when we, Africans, show up telling them we can provide them the best technology. Africans are poor starving people, not innovators or technology experts. We are prepared for that and have been succesful selling to large multinational clients or government entities outside of Africa.

To get this from our own African brothers and sisters is all the more frustrating. And we are no exception. Many other African entrepreneurs have shared similar stories with me. How can we progress if we so distrust our own people?

Yellow Journalism: African Style

You know when you have really made it when you get trashed in our local equivalent of the National Enquirer. I got two full pages in last week's edition. I just found out today because no one I know really reads that paper (or admits to reading it). Someone finally called one of my colleagues to tell him.

I haven't seen it myself but my name in block letters was in the headline. The story goes into detail about how I swindled my business partner and how he sued me in various places and won. Of course, I have never had a business partner and the person mentioned as my business partner was in fact an employee who did indeed win a labor case under dubious circumstances as described in an earlier post: Do me a favor: Don't do me any favors.

I am torn as to how to react to the article. My business side laughs it off and won’t waste time worrying about it. My human side is distraught not necessarily that I am a victim of this latest attack, but that this is what has become of our struggle for freedom of the press.

Years ago, as a student, I was very active in the struggle for democracy and human rights for Africa. I organized and attended many demonstrations, led letter writing campaigns, and other activities to effect change. For this?

Our newspapers have been filled with sensational stories dragging everyone from business people to political authorities, from singers and to sports stars. There is a common expression in the Country today: “He is a Top 50.” This means that the person is gay. The expression originated from an article in one of our tabloids that listed the Top 50 homosexuals from the Country based on their own personal “analysis.”

This trend is not just bad journalism meant to sell newspapers; it is much more insidious than that. Most of the newspapers that engage in the “decimation” business don’t sell any advertising. It is clear that the revenue from the sales of the paper does not cover the cost of printing, so why would journalists risk jail time (defamation is a criminal offense here) to print stories that completely invented? MONEY, of course.

In my case, the newspaper published a teaser a couple days before they printed the whole article. “Coming Soon.. the underside of [me].” This was meant to attract me to the publisher so that I could offer him a larger sum than what had been offered by the person who brought him the article. Unfortunately for them, I did not bite.

This goes the other way too. A few years ago while I was visiting the country, I made the cover of two newspapers the same day with pictures and information culled from various sources. They were extremely kind to me. One article focused on my personal wealth and stated that I was the richest woman from that Country. I remember one sentence that read that “She does not talk to you unless it is in Billions.” I thought it was very funny at the time (I am very far from being the wealthiest anything). When I got back to the US, a bill for $2,000 was waiting for me from one of the publishers. I also remember my father’s comment when he saw a cover article on me in a US Magazine. “It must have been very expensive!”

You pay for negative stories against your competitors or opponents, pay for positive stories about you or your business, pay to keep your name from being dragged through the mud.

We end up reading the government official newspaper to get information. How sad. Is this what we fought for so hard? What will happen when the next journalist gets arrested for what is really a violation of his rights? Who will stand and fight for him?

Update:

Looks like China's journalists are also in the "cash business." This article is in today's Washington Post: Blackmailing By Journalists In China Seen As 'Frequent'. It is all the more serious in China because of the real struggle of real journalists.

It's the About the Application of the Law Stupid!

The Managing Director of the IMF recently visited the country I am in. I read and re-read his concluding statement and it seemed very on-point:

"...Creating an environment conducive to private sector development is another priority area. In this context, strengthening governance, including a sound and predictable legal and regulatory framework, and an efficient judiciary is important."

It sounded almost as pertinent as the New Year speeches our President makes every year. Just as the Director of the IMF, our President really does seem to understand what is wrong with the country. The problem with him is the same as the problem with the Director of the IMF, they are either powerless to do anything about it other than making speeches that give people like me a half an hour's worth of hope that things will change, or they want to look the other way.

A few years ago, our President, in his New Year's speech announced the passage of a law eliminating taxes and duties on all information technology products. I was still living in the States then. About a month after his declaration, I landed in this country with computers, printers and other equipment for our local subsidiary. The customs officers were quick to tell me that we had to pay an inordinate amount of customs duty. We reminded them that the Head of State had announced that there was no more customs duty. They said that they had heard the speech as well and the law had been passed but that the “texts of application” of the law had not yet been drafted so we still had to pay. Of course, they offered a "discount" to keep it off the books. I thought that the receipt would be a weapon to use in the struggle to improve the business environment so we paid up.

A month later, the “texts of application” were published. Before anyone had a chance to take advantage of the new law, they repealed it. Taxes and duties were back on. No speech, no announcement, just those nasty “texts of application” that cancelled the law. Imagine the consequences for a company that placed a large technology order from overseas that had not yet received its merchandise? Not a nice surprise, especially not when the taxes and duties are about 50% of the value of the technology.

Back to the recent IMF visit. Of course, high on the list of the discussions was the fight against corruption. As in the President’s New Year’s speech and in many other political speeches, the government reiterated its commitment against corruption. But that little problem of the “texts of application” of the law creeps up again. In their Letter of Intent following the visit of the IMF, the country stated:

In April 2006, the government enacted a law defining the modalities for application of [the law], which refers to the disclosure of assets by senior government officials. Nevertheless, the commission that was to have been set up under this law to receive the asset declarations has not yet been established because the legal texts governing the application of the law have not yet been prepared. Similarly, the National Commission to Fight Corruption, created in March 2006, is not yet operational as its members have not yet been named, given the considerable time needed to ascertain the integrity of potential members.

Given that corruption is the government’s top priority, you start to understand why nothing changes here. And every time the World Bank, the IMF or US Government officials come in, our government will proudly display the laws on the books to fight corruption, to improve the environment for the private sector, to fight poverty, improve education, etc. And the World Bank and friends will have their conscience relieved that their admonitions were effective and that finally the Country is "behaving." The laws are well written and sound great. The problem is not just that they are not applied but that there is no consequence for not applying them. The judges can see the laws and chose to ignore them with no consequence, same with the police, the custom agents and all other public servants. Until the Country has to account for the non-application of its laws, it will not establish mechanisms to enforce them.

New Technology Initiative in Africa

There is a really great story about another starry eyed entrepreneur who is wiring up Rwanda. http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,457000,00.html.

"Africa offers many investment opportunities," says an enthusiastic Greg Wyler, a boyish-looking man in his mid-thirties. "We simply have to bring the Internet into each of these huts, and the rest will fall into place." Wyler, an American entrepreneur, hopes to launch an "African Renaissance" with his project.

His optimism reminds me of mine, a few years ago. I want him to succeed because I want the me of a few years ago to be right about Africa's potential and our ability to come back from very far. I remember that when we were looking for a motto for our non-profit, we chose "beyond the digital divide." The point was that we should not try to catch up but to leap forward. This meant that we should not be accepting old PCs that could not utilize the latest in technology but try to acquire and develop cutting edge technology which would bring Africa to the forefront of the digital age.

To make this happen, we developed a project called the African Center for Technology Innovation and Ventures (ACTIV). This center was to be a sort of incubator for high-tech entrepreneurs and a place where all types technologies from Africa and elsewhere could be showcased. The ACTIV offices are open and wired up but the center is non-operational because our business was funding the project and we could no longer fund ourselves, let alone this project. It is a pity but the experiences we have had in the country on the business side will help us in better guiding the entrepreneurs once the project is able to launch again. The most important lesson we have learned is that the main impediments to the development of technology are not infrastructure and lack of skills, but corruption and government intervention.

I am still hoping that we will one day be able to make the project happen. The Rwandan example is one of an American entrepreneur contributing to development in Africa through technology. As much as we encourage the Gregs of the world and welcome their initiatives, we also want to empower Africans themselves to build technology businesses. Just wish our governments were not so against us.

My Virtual White American Bosses

When the government agency called last week with the emergency order, they begged me to try to convince my hierarchy in the US to allow us to deliver. I told them I would see what I could do but that given all the problems we have had with collecting from clients in this country, it might be difficult. Of course, I have no hierarchy or let's say that I am the hierarchy. But as a Black African woman in the world of technology, I am often faced with similar situations. No matter what my business card says, I cannot possibly be the boss. I try to use it to my advantage as often as I can. In the case of the government agency, our bosses were putting "tremendous pressure" on us to get immediate payment, if not, they would cancel the order and there was nothing I could do. "You know how Americans are. They don't understand all these administrative hurdles." I even got one of my employees in the US to send an email threatening us for having accepted the order... It actually worked. Where payment generally takes 60-90 days, the payment order is ready and we will get paid next week. Never could I have accomplished this without my virtual White American bosses.