Business Insider Article on Corruption in Africa

http://www.businessinsider.com/ recently published an article on corruption in Africa.



I don't have the other side of the story but this is a very common tale which is certainly not unique to Senegal. Few, if any, of these large licenses or concessions occur without corruption. I am not saying this happened in Millicom's case and I certainly have no inside information but a lot of times these stories become a scandal only when "corruptor" and "corrupted" stop seeing eye to eye.

I read comments that Millicom's license had been revoked for number of years ago but they were still able to do business. Under what agreement? Why didn't Millicom protest then? I am not in any way defending the government of Senegal but in the game of corruption, it takes two to play....

This should serve as an example to other companies who tend to close their eyes when they first want to get in and then are surprised when their former partners come begging for more. I remember meeting a delegation of one of the largest US telecom companies coming to the country I am in. They were really interested in the market. They eventually decided that the risk was not worth it. As they explained to me in private, they were not "experienced" enough with the business environment.

African nations should understand that by requiring foreign investors to bribe officials to get these licenses and concessions, they will get a type of investor that is not necessarily a good corporate citizen. Real investors shy away and sharks come in to do business. ◦

Business Insider Article on Corruption in Africa

Treading the Muddy Waters of Corruption

People often ask me how I manage to keep my "no corruption" stance in an environment in which corruption is the rule and not the exception.

1. My first strategy is to "sell" this concept to my staff.

Most people from this country are accustomed to business being done in a corrupt way. Even when they don't like it or agree with it, they often go along with it just because the alternative seems too hard. The way I sell it is by example; and over time, they see the benefits of the strategy. For instance, taxation officers tend to drop by on Friday afternoon and threaten to seal the office if they are not given their "weekend allowance." We simply say no and agree to be shut down. Others who fall into the trap do give the "allowance." Sure, the tax officer who received the gift will not come back for a few weeks but he will send the word out to his colleagues and they will visit one at a time to get their piece of the pie. In our own case, after a few times of not getting anything, they simply stopped coming. They really don't bother us anymore.

There are many other examples too of employees seeing that a no corruption rule can be beneficial. We have actually won contracts because of our policy (although we have lost more than won).

I also try to position our policy in a greater context to our staff. We often have discussions on the ills of corruption and how this negatively affects the development of our country. I explain how we are too good to participate in that game and if any company can have such a stance, it is us. If we can't, how should we expect companies with fewer resources to do so?

This staff by-in is essential to make the policy work. They are on the front-lines and are getting the push back. They lose deal after deal as a result. If they do not firmly believe we are doing the right thing, then we cannot succeed.

2. I am always ready to walk away from a deal

Sometimes, the corruption is more insidious. You think that you are dealing with people with integrity and you proceed with the proposal with that in mind. At some point, even far down the line, some clients become strange. There are unforeseen delays; they are having personal financial issues; the client boss wants to meet the supplier boss in person... There are a number of signs that point to clients wanting you to come forward with an offer for a bribe. When I see such signs, I just walk away. It is just better that way. If they want a bribe at the proposal stage, even if you get around that somehow, they will get you at the payment stage. Just not worth it. We lose lots of deals this way.

3. I try to maintain relationships unrelated to deals or services

The best time to offer a gift to a client or a government official is when you don't need them for anything. Even here you need to be careful with the gift so that it is not misconstrued. I will personally select a book or other inexpensive item that is of personal interest to the person receiving it. People love pens. We had some nice logo pens made and we give them out as gifts. If there is a deal on the table, no pen. This is simply because some clients might interpret this as an incentive and the beginning of bigger and better things. When you don't follow the pen with a more significant "gesture" they see this as an insult.

Another present people just love is Obama gear. So I brought some back after the inauguration and they were thrilled.

I am not a phone person. I hate the phone but I do try to call government officials from time to time just to say hello. People really appreciate this. I prefer email so when I know that they read their email, I will send a quick hello from time to time.

Another one of my favorite gifts is prepaid phone cards. This is not expensive and people really appreciate it. I usually tell them that I would love to hear from them from time to time but that I know it is expensive for them to call. They still "beep" -- beeping is calling briefly to let their number appear on your caller-ID and then hanging up before you pick up as a sign for you to call since only the caller pays -- but they will often do so to give heads up on a matter of interest to you.

4. Do Say Thank You (and not just with words)

There have been times when people have gone out of their way to help us. This is both in the business sector and in government. Although this is not allowed in the US, we do sometimes say thanks by offering a gift, sometimes even cash. (I know!!! Not me!!!). This is very delicate and has to be done very carefully. First, this can only happen if there is no expectation of any type. If there is an expectation, then it can't work and you get caught up in the game.

Second, it must be separated in time enough from the act that it is not seen to be a pay-for-play deal. Let me give you an example. Court judgments here take sometimes months to get typed up and registered. Until that happens, you just can't execute. We had some a judgment that we needed typed. The court clerk, who had been very friendly with us offered to stay after hours to type it. He said that this was because he had followed the case and really felt bad for us. No expectation. More than a year later, I purchased a cell phone and gave it to that Clerk. It was my way to say thank you. I am his hero now.

Third, this is usually only for lower level staff that are not implicated in the decision-making. This is a secretary, or a security guard, or a similar position where they assisted you in making something happen faster or giving you pointers. For example, with one client, there was a guy working in the IT department with no real title. The guy really liked our solution but he was not part of the decision-making process and had no authority. In fact, he knew from working with that agency, that we would never be selected. He gave us a few tips on how to make sure that our proposal got to the right people so that the decision-makers would be forced to explain why we had not been considered. Using his advice, we won. Well after the project was done and over with, we thanked him with a cash gift. He was getting ready to leave the agency and try to set something up on his own. The cash was what he needed.

There are even times when we have provided a gift to a decision-maker (I know... I know, digging deeper into the mud). This happened twice. In both instances, they were no longer in their capacity when we "thanked" them. They were very surprised and very grateful. And in both cases, they had really helped us a great deal, even at personal cost when everyone else seemed against us. Each time also, they never asked for anything or acted in a manner which led us to believe they had any ulterior motive.

I know a lot of people will say that it is a form of corruption. I struggle with it myself to be very honest. I worry that the recipients of the gift might expect us to do this every time. We have not run into many problems but it is still a concern.

5. Little Corruption is Big Corruption

One of the most annoying type of corruption in this country is what they call the "mange-mille" which translates as "eat-1,000." These are the police who are on the side of the road and will harass you until you give them the equivalent of $2 or more. I have sat in my car for over an hour refusing to give in before they finally let me go. Once, they stopped me and when they saw I had all my documents, they asked for my yellow-fever vaccination certificate. Believe it or not, I had it with me much to their displeasure. Another time, they wanted to cite me for having a suitcase in the back seat. They said that this required a special license to carry mixed cargo (people and goods). I refused to pay. I missed my plane.

This is such an annoyance that most people just pay. What I find though is that once you start justifying the bribe with "it saves me time" arguments, it becomes easier to use those same arguments when the stakes are higher. I know lots of fellow Diasporans who returned to this country with the same "no corruption" philosophy. Then they gave into the police to avoid the hassle; pretty soon it was the customs officials at the airport to avoid paying custom duty; then they started to justify paying the phone company technicians to install a line faster; and then it goes on and on and on... Within a year, they are fully in the system.

6. Be Beyond Reproach

You can't very well complain about police harassment when your papers are not in order; can't complain about courts being unfair when you are on the wrong ; can't complain about tax authorities when you don't pay your taxes.

As a result, you have to ensure that you are always on the right side of the law. In this country, dual-citizenship is not allowed. I have a US passport. I could get one from this country in a day. But that would set me up for being in an irregular situation. Therefore, I apply for and pay $500 for a residency permit every two years. All our employees, including our cleaning staff and security guards are registered with the government. We cover all their withholdings so that their net salary is what it would have been had they been paid under the table. We file our tax returns
monthly no matter what, even when we can't pay them right away. If we are in a legal dispute and we are wrong, we settle. Sometimes even when we are right we try to settle because Court in this country is HELL (see justice heading for more on that).

The beauty of being beyond reproach is FREEDOM. It is wonderful. We are certainly poorer in financial terms for it but nothing can match the feeling of being FREE. I sleep well at night. My conscience is clear and I know that I am doing my part, as small as it might be, to try to make this country a better place. ◦

Treading the Muddy Waters of Corruption

Some Progress with Internet Availability

One of the greatest frustrations in living and working in this African country is access to internet at decent prices. About a year ago, a new provider came in with a huge campaign for the mass-market. Others have tried before but this company seems to have been quite successful. In fact, in a little over a year, they have signed over 25,000 customers. This may not seem like much but when you consider that there are only 100,000 total fixed telephone lines after 50 years, you can quickly see how 25,000 customers becomes important.

A customer first has to buy the equipment; a book size modem for about $150 or a small USB flash card sized modem for about $20. The smaller modem is definitely cheaper but the reception is not as good. Then customers buy prepaid cards denominated between about $2 and $50. the $50 card gets you unlimited usage for 30 days. The other cards have a per minute cost. For about $10 you can get about 16 hours of usage. This is really not bad at all.

The modems work in the three cities and there are plans to deploy to several other smaller towns within the next few months. The speed is pretty slow but fast enough for basic browsing and email.

The other day, I was passing by some security guards. One should note that security guards here make about $60-80 per month so they are on the very low end of the salary grade. But I overheard one explaining to the others how this modem worked and how he could connect for about 30 minutes at a time and get everything he needed done. That is the most exciting part of this solution. It will allow greater internet penetration to sectors of the population who could simply not afford to have the internet installed at home.

Since internet use is "socialized" one connection will serve several people. In one study I saw, one internet connection served an average of 12 users.

This important price decrease has not extended to the business sector where prices still seem exceedingly high. The provider I mentioned in this post recently extended its offerings to the business market. We asked for a quotation. They sent us a proposal for a one year commitment at $900 a month before tax (almost $1,100 including tax) for a 256k connection! Come on y'all.

So as you can see, there is still some ways to go but I am pleased that we seem to be heading in the right direction. ◦

Some Progress with Internet Availability

Twitter

I finally broke down and created a Twitter account. You can follow me on @africatechie. ◦

Twitter

Electric Hell

Not a day goes by when we don’t have to deal with issues that are just not issues in the US. Between the tax guys, the water guys, the Internet guys, and the electric guys, you need a whole team of administrative folks just to spend time dealing with them.

Electricity is very erratic; blackouts and brownouts are common. We estimate our direct losses due to power surges at over $30,000. This is mostly computer equipment but also air conditioners that were damaged or destroyed after frequent power surges

In any case, it is not bad enough that we lose money to their power surges or from days of going without power or the cost of buying and maintaining a generator, the day-to-day service is even worse and the cost is excessive, not to say abusive.

Our average electric bill is roughly $1,200 a month. This is for about 4,000 kwh. Of that, about $245 is fixed. This means that if we use absolutely no power, we still have to pay for the meter rental (about $5 a month) and a “fixed premium” ($240 a month) which no one will explain to us. The bills are payable within 10 days. Cash or certified check. There is no late notice. They just disconnect your service. The problem is that the date on the bill is usually a week or more before you actually get the bill (they are hand delivered and not mailed) so in fact, you have a day or 2 to pay your bill before facing disconnection. And despite their inefficiencies in providing poor service all around, they are extremely effective is sending out teams of disconnection agents who go as far as removing the meter.

In March, we received a bill that was much higher than average. It was about $1700. It was dated on the 2nd but we received it on the 10th. On the 12th, we wrote to the electric company asking for an explanation for the excessive bill, an explanation for the so-called “fixed premium” and for additional time to pay. They refused to take the letter. Simply refused. After spending hour after hour, day after day at the neighborhood branch trying to meet with the branch manager or getting a letter delivered, we finally gave up and tried to pay the bill. We couldn’t. Our account had been cancelled. No reason. No explanation. A couple days later, technicians from the electric company came with a note from the branch manager requiring we prove that we had a legal connection. They wanted to remove the meter since we had “no account”. We gave them all the required documents and they eventually left.

Still unable to meet with the branch manager and unable to have any letter accepted by the receptionist, we took a bailiff with us to the branch. We were allowed in and were able to meet with the branch manager. After a long discussion that was going nowhere, we still did not know why or when they cancelled the account. The branch manager asked us to fill out an application for a new account and pay the required fee, almost $900 to get the same subscription load we have now.

So let me get this straight. You cancel my account for absolutely no reason and for me to get another account I have to REAPPLY and PAY AGAIN!!!! I was trying my best not to reach over his desk and slam his face into his PC. The colleague I was with stayed calm and the bailiff was just shaking his head in disbelief. Seeing our “reluctance” the branch manager went so far as to suggest we could hand write the application not to waste any time.

We asked that they give us a written explanation for the cancellation of our account as well as putting in writing that we needed to sign up for and pay for a new account.. We told them that we would have to justify to our “management” why we needed a new subscription when we had already paid for one in the past. He refused saying the receipt for the new connection fee would be the only thing we would have and that we could send that receipt to our management if they wanted. In the meantime, his agents were coming around to our office to remove our meter since we are using it illegally. Fortunately, we locked the main access to the building and have refused to let them in. They can disconnect us from the pole but it is more complicated and it will take them a few days.

After leaving the branch yesterday, we wrote a letter to the branch manager and had it delivered by our bailiff this morning. Our bailiff spent over and hour and a half listening to the branch manager’s explanations. He came back saying that the branch manager told him that he had received instructions from his head office to cancel our service and that since it was cancelled, the only solution was to reapply and pay again. He “generously” offered to give us some time to pay for the connection fee as long as we reapplied now. Of course, this was unacceptable to us. We managed to get the branch manager on the phone and we asked him for the contact at his head office we could get the explanation from. He completely changed his story and now claimed that the head office had nothing to do with it.

Since our last letter was delivered by bailiff, they will have to answer. In the meantime, we are illegally using electric power which we paid over $2,400 at the time to get installed and we could lose power at any moment.

This place is truly hell. ◦

Electric Hell

Changing Internet Providers

We decided to change internet providers. Our current provider does a pretty good job but at the US $ equivalent of almost $2,000 a month for a 256k connection, it was just too much for our budget. We found another provider (call them OW) that could provide a dedicated 128k connection at a little more than $400. Since the connection is dedicated, we should get roughly the same bandwidth with OW as with the 256k shared we got from the current provider.

We had contacted OW a few months ago and they had given us a quotation that was even higher than our current provider. When we decided last week to look for alternatives one of our interns told us his dad could get us a connection very fast. It turns out that his dad was merely an unofficial reseller for OW. But since our name was not mentioned by the Dad when OW gave him the quote, he was able to get a much better quote than we ever could (people just assume that we are incredibly rich and quotations here are often based on who is buying and not what is being sold).

OW was definitely a little disappointed to find out we were the client. They thought they could have gotten a much higher rate from us. Anyway, their claim to fame is to get you up and running the same day. We placed the order on a Thursday. No installation. They promised to do it on Friday. No installation. Then they promised to come on Saturday. No one showed up. Yesterday, we finally wrote a letter to them saying that if the installation was not complete by 3 PM, we would cancel and they would have to refund the entire installation fee and one month prepayment we had paid (installation cost was over $700 even after negotiations). Their manager agreed to have everything done by then. No one showed up until 2:30 PM. They started working on the roof to set up their equipment. Until 8 PM they were still on the roof. They promised to come this morning by 7 AM to continue. They did not arrive until 10.

A couple hours later, the technical manager comes to see us to explain that they would not be able to install the equipment after all. Their installation requires line of sight and there was a tall building between us and them (I guess they had never noticed it before now) and their equipment would not be tall enough to overcome that. So we have this gigantic beam on our roof that they now have to remove.

We had already cancelled service from our previous provider and we have no internet. Our second choice was with the state owned telecom. They are the exclusive provider of fiber optic service to the other ISPs and are themselves providers using ADSL. The paperwork to get a connection reads like a loan application. In addition to certified copies of this and that, they want photographs of the top manager as well as a copy of his national identity card. We have been customers forever since they have exclusivity over land lines but we don’t exist in their internet system and have to apply like everyone else. The application has to be accompanied with payment (cash or certified check) for the installation charge and one month of service. Then, they send the application to another city where their headquarters are for processing. The application then comes back and we wait until they have an “available port” to connect us to. They are suggesting two or three weeks. That is civil servant speak for “You will get connected in a few months if you are lucky but if you give me enough money I can move your file up and you will get your connection in a week.”

I am not sure what we will do. We might bite the bullet and go back to our previous provider. So frustrating. Such an essential element of development is incredibly expensive and difficult to obtain. There must be a better way.

Update: We went back to our original provider. Unfortunately, the new provider had sabotaged the original installation (removed the antenna, cut cables, disabled the radio) and after 2 weeks, our former provider is still working to fix the problem. So still no Internet. ◦

Changing Internet Providers

Fiscal Tyranny (Part 1)

Yesterday, our tax adviser stopped by for a meeting to discuss our monthly filings. A meeting that was intended to raise her concerns about hotel bills turned into a philosophical discussion about taxes in this country.

Our tax advisor’s specific concern was that we had paid hotel bills for some people but that our records did not reflect a contract for those people or any consulting payment to them. Our explanation to her was that these people were company staff in the US and Europe who had travelled to our country to provide sales and technical assistance just made it worse. That meant that we needed to pay a technical assistance tax of 15% for those individuals. We explained that they were employed by our US and European entities and therefore there was no fee to be paid by our local entity and 15% of 0 was 0.

She explained that this would never fly with the tax authorities. We needed to draft a technical assistance contract for their work with an estimation of the value of their services even though the services would not be paid for. She also warned that without those contracts, we would likely have to pay for payroll related taxes for those individuals even though they are not on our payroll. Of course, once a contract is established, it needs to be “registered” with the tax authorities and the “fee” is 2% of the value of the contract. If the contract was registered late, then there is a 100% penalty for the fee. There are also taxes on the fees which are about 50%. So really you are paying 3% or 6% if you register more than 30 days after the work is performed. If the amount is under the $US of $10,000 then the registration “fee” is actually 5% plus the taxes, all doubled if you are 30 days late.

So because we wanted to reinforce our local activities with resources who came in from overseas we now had to pay thousands of dollars in taxes for services which we never had to pay for out of our local coffers.

This was insane but very logical to this poor tax advisor who was just doing her job. She was so enmeshed in the tax code and the way of doing business in this country that she was oblivious to the madness of the tax code and surprised that we objected to it. She really believes that this is the way business is done all over the world and she said that we were the first to complain not just about the process (will blog about that another time) but about the tax structure itself.

And that is the real problem. It is impossible to make real progress when most stakeholders do not understand that business as usual in this country is detrimental to our development. Everyone focuses on enforcing the current system and or complaining about the heaving handed collection process. But what is needed is a complete change in mentality. Taxes, fees, duties are not elements of progress for business but elements of repression. This by itself is not unique to this country. Business people all over the world complain about taxation and regulation. The state of Maryland, where our business was started, has just instituted a sales tax on computer services amidst an uproar from the tech community. Where this becomes insidious in a developing country like the one I am in is that the complexity and multiple layers of taxation are taken as an opportunity for tax officials to personally enrich themselves. The more complicated the tax structure is, the more repressive it is, the more taxpayers will look for ways to cheat and tax officials are all too happy to assist them in that manner… for a personal fee. ◦

Fiscal Tyranny (Part 1)

OLPC's Fatal Flaw

I have a lot of admiration for Nicholas Negroponte and the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) team. By in large, they got the technology right. They brought the right partners together and created an unbelievable product. The technological advances that are found in the $100 (OK, $300) laptop will certainly impact the way computers are built tomorrow.

OLPC has not had the expected success. There is nothing technically wrong with it. The pricing is reasonable. So why hasn't the laptop caught on in the developing world it was designed for?

The name says it all: ONE laptop PER child. The idea might be appealing to the western world but it is not a cultural fit for the developing world, or at least Africa where I am blogging from. Africans are very communal in nature. Outside of the wealthy elite that is not the target of the OLPC anyway, Africans don't individually own things, especially not children. Whoever has a radio or a television shares it with not just the immediate family, but the entire community. One never watches TV alone and one does not sit in a corner and read alone or get on a computer alone. People still do things together. Not because they are forced to but because that is the way they prefer it.

How do you reconcile this communal culture with the OLPC technology? Probably through a new approach. As well intended as the project sponsors are, I simply cannot imagine any African politician buying into the idea in any meaningful way. It is one of those things that are difficult to explain. Kind of like explaining to a white person what is it like to be black. You can't really put it into words.

Maybe they could rename it "laptops for all" and set them up for multiple users. Maybe they could change the target from children to families. It might not sound very politically correct but a business owner could leverage the technology a lot more and turn the laptop into increased revenue. By keeping track of inventory, accounting, communicating with customers and vendors electronically, the businessperson would use it in the day and his/her kids could use it in the evening. You could then have the government partially subsidize the computer and set up a loan through credit union or other micro-credit institution to finance the rest. Then you would have "One Laptop per Family" which is more in tune with our culture.... and, because it is contributing to economic growth, would be more sustaining long term. ◦

OLPC's Fatal Flaw

Africans Don't Trust Africans with Technology

One would logically think that the most likely consumers of African technology would be Africans. Not so. Africans do not trust each other to provide quality technology.

Last year, we heard that a large company that is almost across the street from us wanted to implement a CRM (Customer Relationship Management) system. Since we are one of the few companies with experience in that area and given that we worked with several of this company's sister companies in various countries, including the US, we thought we had a good shot at getting the project. We approached them and offered to make a presentation. They explained to us that we were way too small for them and that they were going through an invitation only bidding process. Only European companies would be invited. Because there are few CRM implementations in this country, we thought that we would offer to assist them, at no cost, so that there would be a reference for a CRM project in the country. They refused. They were hiring consultants from Europe to provide project support. OK. Even free, our services are not worth it. Jeez.

A few months later, we received a call from a European company that was bidding on a CRM project in Africa. They did not have any experience and did not have any resources and they wanted to know if we would partner with them. You guessed it. Same client. Same project. We agreed.

We had to prepare the entire proposal and provide OUR references. Our partner company prettied up the proposal with their logo and made no reference to us. They redid the resumes so that our name would not appear anywhere. The proposal was shortlisted and the client requested a presentation. Oops. Our partner's sales folks flew in but, unable to answer any technical questions, had to include us. So we accompany them across the street for the presentation. Client did not hide their surprise. Our proposal turned out to be the best one. We (our partners) won. So here it was. We were not allowed to interact directly with the client so our partner sent a "project manager" to this country. Over a period of six months, we actually saw 4 different ones.

So here we were in this ridiculous process of having to send the project manager emails that he then copied and pasted into his emails to the client. The client would answer and he would forward the emails to us. Then, in the fine European tradition, our partner's project manager had to go on vacation so the project was at a standstill while he went on holiday. Then they sent someone new (after all, this is an African country, you send the people none of your European clients would accept). We lost 4 months on a project that should have lasted 3 as a result of the project management problems.

We would get sign off, send it to Europe, send them our bill. They would send their bill (our bill multiplied by 3) to the client. Client would wire the money to Europe and then, eventually (sometimes months later), partner wired money back to us. We eventually finished the project and the client was very pleased. Of course, our partner gets the reference and they profiled their success on their web site. As logical as it might seem for the client to contact us directly next time, they probably won't. They are too ashamed.

This was not the first time we faced the distrust of an African client. Before this subsidiary opened, we were contacted in the US by a large American software company for training on their technology in an African country. They knew that we had resources that could train in French (language of the client) and asked for some resumes. We sent the resume of our most qualified instructor. I got a phone call from the software company's African training manager. She asked if there was another resume I could send because our instructor's name sounded African. She said the African client complained that for the daily rate we were charging they "expected a White person." We did not do the training.

We do expect some push back from American and European clients when we, Africans, show up telling them we can provide them the best technology. Africans are poor starving people, not innovators or technology experts. We are prepared for that and have been succesful selling to large multinational clients or government entities outside of Africa.

To get this from our own African brothers and sisters is all the more frustrating. And we are no exception. Many other African entrepreneurs have shared similar stories with me. How can we progress if we so distrust our own people? ◦

Africans Don't Trust Africans with Technology

Yellow Journalism: African Style

You know when you have really made it when you get trashed in our local equivalent of the National Enquirer. I got two full pages in last week's edition. I just found out today because no one I know really reads that paper (or admits to reading it). Someone finally called one of my colleagues to tell him.

I haven't seen it myself but my name in block letters was in the headline. The story goes into detail about how I swindled my business partner and how he sued me in various places and won. Of course, I have never had a business partner and the person mentioned as my business partner was in fact an employee who did indeed win a labor case under dubious circumstances as described in an earlier post: Do me a favor: Don't do me any favors.

I am torn as to how to react to the article. My business side laughs it off and won’t waste time worrying about it. My human side is distraught not necessarily that I am a victim of this latest attack, but that this is what has become of our struggle for freedom of the press.

Years ago, as a student, I was very active in the struggle for democracy and human rights for Africa. I organized and attended many demonstrations, led letter writing campaigns, and other activities to effect change. For this?

Our newspapers have been filled with sensational stories dragging everyone from business people to political authorities, from singers and to sports stars. There is a common expression in the Country today: “He is a Top 50.” This means that the person is gay. The expression originated from an article in one of our tabloids that listed the Top 50 homosexuals from the Country based on their own personal “analysis.”

This trend is not just bad journalism meant to sell newspapers; it is much more insidious than that. Most of the newspapers that engage in the “decimation” business don’t sell any advertising. It is clear that the revenue from the sales of the paper does not cover the cost of printing, so why would journalists risk jail time (defamation is a criminal offense here) to print stories that completely invented? MONEY, of course.

In my case, the newspaper published a teaser a couple days before they printed the whole article. “Coming Soon.. the underside of [me].” This was meant to attract me to the publisher so that I could offer him a larger sum than what had been offered by the person who brought him the article. Unfortunately for them, I did not bite.

This goes the other way too. A few years ago while I was visiting the country, I made the cover of two newspapers the same day with pictures and information culled from various sources. They were extremely kind to me. One article focused on my personal wealth and stated that I was the richest woman from that Country. I remember one sentence that read that “She does not talk to you unless it is in Billions.” I thought it was very funny at the time (I am very far from being the wealthiest anything). When I got back to the US, a bill for $2,000 was waiting for me from one of the publishers. I also remember my father’s comment when he saw a cover article on me in a US Magazine. “It must have been very expensive!”

You pay for negative stories against your competitors or opponents, pay for positive stories about you or your business, pay to keep your name from being dragged through the mud.

We end up reading the government official newspaper to get information. How sad. Is this what we fought for so hard? What will happen when the next journalist gets arrested for what is really a violation of his rights? Who will stand and fight for him?

Update:

Looks like China's journalists are also in the "cash business." This article is in today's Washington Post: Blackmailing By Journalists In China Seen As 'Frequent'. It is all the more serious in China because of the real struggle of real journalists.

◦

Yellow Journalism: African Style

It's the About the Application of the Law Stupid!

The Managing Director of the IMF recently visited the country I am in. I read and re-read his concluding statement and it seemed very on-point:

"...Creating an environment conducive to private sector development is another priority area. In this context, strengthening governance, including a sound and predictable legal and regulatory framework, and an efficient judiciary is important."

It sounded almost as pertinent as the New Year speeches our President makes every year. Just as the Director of the IMF, our President really does seem to understand what is wrong with the country. The problem with him is the same as the problem with the Director of the IMF, they are either powerless to do anything about it other than making speeches that give people like me a half an hour's worth of hope that things will change, or they want to look the other way.

A few years ago, our President, in his New Year's speech announced the passage of a law eliminating taxes and duties on all information technology products. I was still living in the States then. About a month after his declaration, I landed in this country with computers, printers and other equipment for our local subsidiary. The customs officers were quick to tell me that we had to pay an inordinate amount of customs duty. We reminded them that the Head of State had announced that there was no more customs duty. They said that they had heard the speech as well and the law had been passed but that the “texts of application” of the law had not yet been drafted so we still had to pay. Of course, they offered a "discount" to keep it off the books. I thought that the receipt would be a weapon to use in the struggle to improve the business environment so we paid up.

A month later, the “texts of application” were published. Before anyone had a chance to take advantage of the new law, they repealed it. Taxes and duties were back on. No speech, no announcement, just those nasty “texts of application” that cancelled the law. Imagine the consequences for a company that placed a large technology order from overseas that had not yet received its merchandise? Not a nice surprise, especially not when the taxes and duties are about 50% of the value of the technology.

Back to the recent IMF visit. Of course, high on the list of the discussions was the fight against corruption. As in the President’s New Year’s speech and in many other political speeches, the government reiterated its commitment against corruption. But that little problem of the “texts of application” of the law creeps up again. In their Letter of Intent following the visit of the IMF, the country stated:

In April 2006, the government enacted a law defining the modalities for application of [the law], which refers to the disclosure of assets by senior government officials. Nevertheless, the commission that was to have been set up under this law to receive the asset declarations has not yet been established because the legal texts governing the application of the law have not yet been prepared. Similarly, the National Commission to Fight Corruption, created in March 2006, is not yet operational as its members have not yet been named, given the considerable time needed to ascertain the integrity of potential members.

Given that corruption is the government’s top priority, you start to understand why nothing changes here. And every time the World Bank, the IMF or US Government officials come in, our government will proudly display the laws on the books to fight corruption, to improve the environment for the private sector, to fight poverty, improve education, etc. And the World Bank and friends will have their conscience relieved that their admonitions were effective and that finally the Country is "behaving." The laws are well written and sound great. The problem is not just that they are not applied but that there is no consequence for not applying them. The judges can see the laws and chose to ignore them with no consequence, same with the police, the custom agents and all other public servants. Until the Country has to account for the non-application of its laws, it will not establish mechanisms to enforce them.

◦

It's the About the Application of the Law Stupid!

New Technology Initiative in Africa

There is a really great story about another starry eyed entrepreneur who is wiring up Rwanda. http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,457000,00.html.

"Africa offers many investment opportunities," says an enthusiastic Greg Wyler, a boyish-looking man in his mid-thirties. "We simply have to bring the Internet into each of these huts, and the rest will fall into place." Wyler, an American entrepreneur, hopes to launch an "African Renaissance" with his project.

His optimism reminds me of mine, a few years ago. I want him to succeed because I want the me of a few years ago to be right about Africa's potential and our ability to come back from very far. I remember that when we were looking for a motto for our non-profit, we chose "beyond the digital divide." The point was that we should not try to catch up but to leap forward. This meant that we should not be accepting old PCs that could not utilize the latest in technology but try to acquire and develop cutting edge technology which would bring Africa to the forefront of the digital age.

To make this happen, we developed a project called the African Center for Technology Innovation and Ventures (ACTIV). This center was to be a sort of incubator for high-tech entrepreneurs and a place where all types technologies from Africa and elsewhere could be showcased. The ACTIV offices are open and wired up but the center is non-operational because our business was funding the project and we could no longer fund ourselves, let alone this project. It is a pity but the experiences we have had in the country on the business side will help us in better guiding the entrepreneurs once the project is able to launch again. The most important lesson we have learned is that the main impediments to the development of technology are not infrastructure and lack of skills, but corruption and government intervention.

I am still hoping that we will one day be able to make the project happen. The Rwandan example is one of an American entrepreneur contributing to development in Africa through technology. As much as we encourage the Gregs of the world and welcome their initiatives, we also want to empower Africans themselves to build technology businesses. Just wish our governments were not so against us. ◦

New Technology Initiative in Africa

My Virtual White American Bosses

When the government agency called last week with the emergency order, they begged me to try to convince my hierarchy in the US to allow us to deliver. I told them I would see what I could do but that given all the problems we have had with collecting from clients in this country, it might be difficult. Of course, I have no hierarchy or let's say that I am the hierarchy. But as a Black African woman in the world of technology, I am often faced with similar situations. No matter what my business card says, I cannot possibly be the boss. I try to use it to my advantage as often as I can. In the case of the government agency, our bosses were putting "tremendous pressure" on us to get immediate payment, if not, they would cancel the order and there was nothing I could do. "You know how Americans are. They don't understand all these administrative hurdles." I even got one of my employees in the US to send an email threatening us for having accepted the order... It actually worked. Where payment generally takes 60-90 days, the payment order is ready and we will get paid next week. Never could I have accomplished this without my virtual White American bosses. ◦

My Virtual White American Bosses

It ain't over 'til its over..

I thought that 2006 was over; at least from a business perspective... This afternoon the last Saturday of the year, I get a call from a project manager with one of the government agencies. He is desperately trying to reach one of my colleagues who is busy at a wedding. He explains that the minister and the head of this government agency are in town and they want to sign the contract today.

Background:
For the last year or so, we have been trying to get in on a project financed by an international organization for this government agency. For about six months, we could not even get in to submit a quotation which was for a small part of the overall project (software licenses). Finally, we wrote to the international organization that was sponsoring the project, and a couple weeks later, we were called by the agency to submit a quote. Our very first quote, for the exact same products as our competitor, without any discounts on our part, was less than one third what our competitor's was. That got us a meeting. During this meeting, and a few working sessions after that, it became clear that the list of products that the client wanted and the quantity of each, was excessive. We actually had to convince them that they did not need everything they said they wanted. In our normal naïveté, we explained that as much as we wanted to sell, this was also an act of citizenship since we knew that this part of the project was paid out of the agency’s budget, thus out of the country’s own funds. Our final quote was for less than 10% of the quote from our main competitor.

For months, we never heard anything back. There were suggestions that we needed to “motivate” the decision-makers but we resisted and decided that we would prefer to lose, rather than to engage in any form of corruption. Then around the end of August, we get an urgent call from the agency saying that we need to bring them our administrative documents immediately, and that we should come “personally” to deliver them. This issue of administrative documents is one that I will definitely address in a future blog because it is a definite impediment to doing business, at least doing business ethically. In any case, one of our guys immediately took over the administrative documents. While there, the project manager begins asking him about whether or not we are sure that our quote is final and wants to know if it “includes everything.” Since the person responsible for that account had traveled out of the country, the guy that we sent called me urgently to come join him in the meeting.

I hate these types of meetings and I avoid them at all costs. But our guy was not familiar with the account so I had to go. As soon as I walk into the project manager’s office, I realize something is up. Our guy seems confused. The project manager meets me with a snake-like smile. I hate him already. Our account manager had told me about his very first encounter with him. During their meeting, the project manager had turned his computer screen towards him showing him the picture of a BMW X5, suggesting that it was the “gift” he expected. Our guy pretended not to understand. That is our general strategy, “act stupid.”

After niceties, the project manager tells us that of all the vendors, they chose us. He repeated that several times, mentioning the names of our competitors. He was uncomfortable. He was not getting to the point. I thanked him for the trust his team had placed in us. “But,” he says “are you sure that you included everything in this quote? Because, you know, we have an additional $30,000 (equivalent) in the budget.” I answered that everything was included. He insisted again. “You know, the government is not like the private sector, it might take time to get paid, did you add a provision to account for collecting your payment?” I understood full well what he was trying to do but I put on my naïve American hat and answered that the amount was before tax so that with tax, it would even exceed the $30,000. I offered to give a discount to get the amount under budget. “NO, NO, NO, don’t do that!” he answered. “You obviously do not have experience with government accounts; let me school you with government deals.” I continue to act stupid, and so does my colleague. I thank him for offering to “teach us.” He instructs us to go back and redo the quotation, adding the tax and a “little something extra.” We smiled, said ok, and left. The next day, we sent the new quote with tax, and nothing extra.

By then, our account manager had returned. The project manager called him for an urgent meeting. We knew what it was about, and decided that the three of us would go (the colleague that took the documents, the account manager, and me). We spent an hour in the project manager’s office and he never really said anything. He was beating around the bush. We played stupid. Finally, he said that this was a direct deal that would not go through a normal tender process and that HE would be the one that would draft the letter to explain why we should be selected. We offered to provide references. “NO, NO, NO, you don’t need that. I am the person that makes the decision.” We pretended not to get it. Eventually, there was no more small talk to be made and we left.

The following day, they called our account manager and insisted that he should come alone. It might be useful to know that the other colleague and I both spent many years abroad so the account manager was the only “local” guy which meant he would better understand "local" business practices, at least, in the eyes of the project manager. During that meeting, the client went straight to the point. How much would go to the project manager? Our account manager maneuvered his way through by saying that he would not want to insult someone of the project manager’s stature by offering him money. He flattered him and added that in these times (anti-corruption drive by government) it would be exposing the project manager and we wanted to protect him. The project manager thanked him profusely for wanting to “protect” him. Our account manager came back happy that he had convinced the project manager that a bribe would be against his interests.

Well, we did not hear back from that project manager until today, five months later. Our letters and phone calls during these months were left unanswered. About three weeks ago, they announced the launch of the project on television and in the press. The project would go live on January 1, 2007. They still did not have the software licenses. Last week, we finally called the minister himself to warn him that if they launched without acquiring the software licenses, they could face penalties. He said he would look into it. I guess he did.

The project manager was panicked as he spoke to me today. The minister did not want them to be in a situation of illegality and he absolutely wanted to sign today. Unfortunately, they could not prepare a purchase order and would not be able to make any advance payment. However, he asked that we prepare a letter that included the terms we wanted and the minister would sign it. So I pulled my colleague out of the wedding, we prepared a letter where the minister promised payment in full by Tuesday, January 2, 2007. In the midst of the reception for the launch of the project, the minister signed the letter without changing a comma. We delivered the software licenses. Of course, we know that we won’t get paid on Tuesday but hopefully we will get paid soon after that.

Today is a victory of sorts. This agency is known as one of the most corrupt ones in the country. We got a contract without any bribe. It is a miracle and no one will ever believe us, but we held our ground and we won. That’s one for the good guys… Now hope we get paid. ◦

It ain't over 'til its over..

Optimistic about 2007

I wonder if it's an entrepreneur's disease to always believe things will be better tomorrow than they are today. Every year I am convinced that the following year will be the best and this time is no different. I am really looking forward to 2007, and not just because 2006 was so difficult.

I don't think business will get any easier but I do believe that it will be easier to deal with. I am more mature; I better understand the environment and know better how to protect myself. I have also learned not to stress myself out as much.

In January 2004 I came to this country to handle an issue I thought would take two weeks and I am still here almost three years later. Now I understand that certain issues, no matter how simple they may seem, cannot be resolved in two weeks, or two years, or at all. I have learned to choose my battles and have not just accepted the daily struggles but have embraced them.

From a non philosophical sense too, I am more confident about 2007. The last couple of weeks I have actually spent most of my time on our core business. Working on proposals, meeting with clients... This is quite different from the rest of the year where 90% of my time was dealing with problems that had absolutely nothing to do with our core business which is technology.

So from now until Tuesday, I will set aside reality and dream about how fantastic 2007 will be... ◦

Optimistic about 2007